Today, Tuesday, the Federal Integrity Commission announced the issuance of three decisions in the presence of severe and simple imprisonment against the director of the municipality of Hilla and its former property official. Because they intentionally committed something that violated their job duties; With the intention of benefiting individuals at the expense of the state.
A statement from the Authority’s Government Media and Communications Office, received by Al-Rasheed, stated that “The Hilla Misdemeanor Court, which is competent to consider integrity cases, issued a court ruling to imprison the former director of the Hilla Municipality.” Because he registered plots of land; Based on non-fundamental correction procedures; As they are commercial pieces,” he pointed out that “this violates Cabinet Resolution No. (252 of 2017) and the controls and instructions in force.” With the intention of benefiting people at the expense of the state.”
He added, “The Babylon Criminal Court – the Third Tribunal issued two in-person rulings, each of which required severe imprisonment for a period of two years, against the official of the Property Division in the former Hilla Municipality Directorate.” Because he prepared a report for the exchange of several commercial plots of land, as well as allocating a property to one of the beneficiaries, in violation of the law.”
He explained that “the two aforementioned courts, after reviewing the evidence available in the two cases, which were represented by the statements of the legal representatives of the Municipality Directorate and the Babylon Governorate Office, the report of the External Audit Division of the Integrity Commission, and the administrative investigation that included the negligence of the accused, issued their decisions to impose a prison sentence on the convicts in accordance with the provisions of Article (331). ) of the Penal Code, giving the right to the affected parties (Hilla Municipality and the Babylon Governorate Office) to demand compensation before the civil courts.”
