Alito doubts America’s left and right can coexist after wife secretly tapes criticism of Pride flag | Samuel Alito

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito, who is at the center of the flag controversy, said one side in America’s bitter left-right ideological conflict must prevail, saying in secretly recorded remarks that they could exacerbating people’s concerns.

Alito – one of the Supreme Court’s most conservative justices – also agreed that America must “return to its sacred ground” in an off-the-cuff comment about a filmmaker posing as a conservative.

His wife, Martha-Ann Alito, was also recorded making critical comments about the gay pride flag.

Most recently, the Alito family was revealed to have flown an upside-down American flag outside their home just weeks after the January 6 Capitol insurrection, symbolizing the “Stop the Steal” movement that sought to overturn the results of the 2020 election in favor of Donald Trump. Trump.

The couple shared their feelings with liberal filmmaker Lauren Windsor. conservative. She held a conversation with Alito to discuss the prospects for a compromise solution to America’s polarized political landscape.

Alito seemed to rule out the possibility of such a compromise, saying: “One side or the other is going to win,” before adding:

“There can be a way of working, a way of peaceful coexistence, but it’s difficult, you know, because there are differences on fundamental issues that really cannot be compromised.”

“People who believe in God in this country must continue to fight to return our country to a place of godliness,” Windsor said.

The judge responded: “I agree with you. I agree with you.

The exchange will further intensify scrutiny of Alito after the flag controversy raised questions about Alito’s impartiality, especially after the Alitos flew another flag favored by protesters on January 6 at their New Jersey vacation home. Following the news of the “Call to Heaven” slogan, the exchange will further intensify its scrutiny of Alito.

The revelations prompted calls from Democrats for Alito to recuse himself from the Supreme Court’s upcoming ruling on the Jan. 6 incident.

The judge refused to do so, saying it was his wife who chose to fly the flag outside his home and claiming he had no say.

Martha-Ann Alito also waded further into the flag controversy at a historical society dinner, criticizing the flag being flown during Gay Pride Month.

“You know what I want?” she said in the Windsor recording. “I want a Sacred Heart of Jesus flag because next month I have to see the Pride flag across the lagoon.”

She then considered other flags she might raise to mock her ideological opponents — including one with the Italian word “shame.”

“He said, ‘Oh, please don’t put up the flag,'” she said, apparently referring to her husband. “I’m not going to do it because I’m at your mercy. But when you get rid of this crap, I’m going to put it out there and I’m going to send them a message every day, maybe every week, and I’m going to change the logo.

“They would be all kinds. I made a flag in my heart. That’s how I satisfied myself. I made a flag. It was white with yellow and orange flames around it. In the middle was “vergogna” The word Vergogna means shame in Italian.

In further, particularly sarcastic exchanges, including critical comments to a female journalist, Martha-Ann Alito appeared to be persuaded by Windsor, agreeing that negotiations with the “radical left” were impossible and expressing concern that The reporter cursed repeatedly to show that he had no objection.

Windsor was less successful in soliciting the unbridled opinion of Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, who balked at her suggestion that the country was irreparably polarized.

Pressed by Windsor on whether the court should have a role in steering the country down a “more moral path,” Roberts said: “No, I think the role of the court is to decide cases.”

Windsor’s strategy was criticized by the Historical Society. “We condemn the covert recording of judges at the event, which was inconsistent with the overall spirit of the evening,” James Duff, the group’s president, said in a statement.

Defending herself, she said the lack of publicity in the court meant there was no other way. “They’re keeping it under wraps, and we’re seeing that they’re willing to go to extraordinary lengths to overturn long-standing precedent,” Windsor told The Washington Post. “Americans are really at a crossroads: Do we continue to have a secular democracy or do we let it go The conservative majority leads us down the path of Christian theocracy.”